BIG BLOCK FORD
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Critique my 460 build

3 posters

Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Critique my 460 build

Post  plovett September 23rd 2009, 1:12 pm

Critique my 460 "budget build" por favor! It's intended as a pump gas street motor. Hypothetical vehicle is a stripped down '67 Cougar with C6, 3.89 gears, approximately 3500 rpm stall.

I don't have any of the parts (aside from the carb) so I'm not looking for affirmation. Laughing So feel free to critique freely.

- 0.060" over block. Any block
- Factory stock stroke crank.
- 472.6 cubic inches
- Eagle SIR rods
- Speed Pro forged pistons with 22 cc dish
- 10.27:1 compression ratio with zero deck and .040" thick head gasket. That's what I calculate anyway.
- Howards Cams solid flat tappet cam 242371.
- 286/296 degrees adv. 250/256 degrees @ 0.050". 110 LSA. .588/.605" lift
- Ford SCJ heads bought assembled. The "A" version? for flat tappet cams. Run out of the box.
- Edelbrock Torker II manifold. Run out of the box with a 1" open spacer.
- 2" primary headers for a '67-'70 Mustang/Cougar Chassis. Crites?
- Holley 850 double pumper with Proform main body
- rocker arms???

I know I left out a lot of details, but it is still hypothetical.

I think it'd make peak power around 5900-6000 rpm and shift around 6300-6400 rpm.

570 hp?

Are new SCJ heads really 72CC?

Thoughts? Comments? Derision???

paulie

plovett

Posts : 65
Join date : 2009-08-10

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  Lem Evans September 23rd 2009, 1:39 pm

72cc yes.....like any other cyl head it could be +/- 1cc .

Lem Evans

Posts : 7445
Join date : 2008-12-03
Location : Livermore , Ky

http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  plovett September 23rd 2009, 1:42 pm

Lem Evans wrote:72cc yes.....like any other cyl head it could be +/- 1cc .

Thanks for the info. My Edelbrock FE heads are supposed to be 72cc. They are actually 79 cc. The machine shop told me that. I checked them myself and they are indeed 79 cc. That's why I ask.

How about the build? Stud or Dud?

paulie

plovett

Posts : 65
Join date : 2009-08-10

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  Lem Evans September 23rd 2009, 2:10 pm

i think you are hitting right in there for a bang for the buck build.....the flat tappet packages sometimes don't get enough respect but sqeeze alot of $s out of the build . The flow curve of the SCJ plays right to a typical flat tappet lift....they'll peak at or before .600" lift .

Lem Evans

Posts : 7445
Join date : 2008-12-03
Location : Livermore , Ky

http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  plovett September 23rd 2009, 6:53 pm

Lem Evans wrote:i think you are hitting right in there for a bang for the buck build.....the flat tappet packages sometimes don't get enough respect but sqeeze alot of $s out of the build . The flow curve of the SCJ plays right to a typical flat tappet lift....they'll peak at or before .600" lift .

Thanks Lem! Bang for the buck is what I was going for. I'd like about 1/2 point higher compression, but I didn't see cheap off the shelf forged pistons to get me there.

Do you think my hp guess and rpm for power peak are close?

Thanks,

paulie

plovett

Posts : 65
Join date : 2009-08-10

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  Lem Evans September 23rd 2009, 8:19 pm

Mill the heads if you need more comp...but you may be thinking about it too much .
3100 rpm stall ......you may want a 109* or 108* cam....off the rack units aint always that correct Wink

Lem Evans

Posts : 7445
Join date : 2008-12-03
Location : Livermore , Ky

http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  plovett September 23rd 2009, 8:43 pm

Lem Evans wrote:Mill the heads if you need more comp...but you may be thinking about it too much .
3100 rpm stall ......you may want a 109* or 108* cam....off the rack units aint always that correct Wink

Thank you very much!

paulie

plovett

Posts : 65
Join date : 2009-08-10

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  BOSS 429 September 25th 2009, 1:00 am

[quote="plovett"]Critique my 460 "budget build" por favor! It's intended as a pump gas street motor. Hypothetical vehicle is a stripped down '67 Cougar with C6, 3.89 gears, approximately 3500 rpm stall.

I don't have any of the parts (aside from the carb) so I'm not looking for affirmation. Laughing So feel free to critique freely.

- 0.060" over block. Any block , < FINE
- Factory stock stroke crank. ,< OK WHY IF YOU CAN BUY RODS,GO 4.150
- 472.6 cubic inches
- Eagle SIR rods < OK
- Speed Pro forged pistons with 22 cc dish < NOPE FLAT IF POSSABLE, 10.5 OR 7 TO 1
- 10.27:1 compression ratio with zero deck and .040" thick head gasket. That's what I calculate anyway.< NOT ENOUGHT
- Howards Cams solid flat tappet cam 242371. < NOPE, ,ROLLER
- 286/296 degrees adv. 250/256 degrees @ 0.050". 110 LSA. .588/.605" lift < SMALL ,UNLESS A ROLLER
- Ford SCJ heads bought assembled. The "A" version? for flat tappet cams. Run out of the box. < WOULDNT OUT OF THE BOX
- Edelbrock Torker II manifold. Run out of the box with a 1" open spacer. < NO
- 2" primary headers for a '67-'70 Mustang/Cougar Chassis. Crites? < 2 3/8'S
- Holley 850 double pumper with Proform main body , < KINDA SMALL
- rocker arms??? <1.73'S

-R
BOSS 429
BOSS 429

Posts : 2372
Join date : 2009-08-10
Location : Ill

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  plovett September 25th 2009, 11:18 am

[quote="BOSS 429"]
plovett wrote:Critique my 460 "budget build" por favor! It's intended as a pump gas street motor. Hypothetical vehicle is a stripped down '67 Cougar with C6, 3.89 gears, approximately 3500 rpm stall.

I don't have any of the parts (aside from the carb) so I'm not looking for affirmation. Laughing So feel free to critique freely.

- 0.060" over block. Any block , < FINE
- Factory stock stroke crank. ,< OK WHY IF YOU CAN BUY RODS,GO 4.150
Because the rods would cost more and the crank would cost more. Also harder to hook up on the street.

- 472.6 cubic inches
- Eagle SIR rods < OK
- Speed Pro forged pistons with 22 cc dish < NOPE FLAT IF POSSABLE, 10.5 OR 7 TO 1
I think flat tops would put me around 12:1 compression.

- 10.27:1 compression ratio with zero deck and .040" thick head gasket. That's what I calculate anyway.< NOT ENOUGHT
- Howards Cams solid flat tappet cam 242371. < NOPE, ,ROLLER
Roller not in the "budget build" plus I think street longevity better with flat tappet.

- 286/296 degrees adv. 250/256 degrees @ 0.050". 110 LSA. .588/.605" lift < SMALL ,UNLESS A ROLLER
What rpm range do you think the above cam would run in a 466-472 cid motor? What solid flat tappet cam would you go with?

- Ford SCJ heads bought assembled. The "A" version? for flat tappet cams. Run out of the box. < WOULDNT OUT OF THE BOX
Out of the box for budget reasons. And these heads bought assemled are real cheap right now.

- Edelbrock Torker II manifold. Run out of the box with a 1" open spacer. < NO
Torker II is for hood clearance reasons. What would you run?

- 2" primary headers for a '67-'70 Mustang/Cougar Chassis. Crites? < 2 3/8'S
You'd run 2-3/8" headers on a ~570 hp motor turning 6500 rpm or less?

- Holley 850 double pumper with Proform main body , < KINDA SMALL
Agreed. But it's for the Torker II intake.

- rocker arms??? <1.73'S
I was thinking stock ratio too. I was wondering what brand.

-R

plovett

Posts : 65
Join date : 2009-08-10

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  Lem Evans September 25th 2009, 7:00 pm

Budget-Pump gas-Street machine is what I hear . A flat tappet cam and the 2" headers will be fine.....It'll make a Street Hemi , 428 SCJ or LS6 454 look like a p.o.s. Smile

Lem Evans

Posts : 7445
Join date : 2008-12-03
Location : Livermore , Ky

http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  plovett September 26th 2009, 10:10 am

Yup. I don't doubt that it'd be easy to find another 100+ hp over what I listed; with a Victor intake, ported SCJ's, more compression, and a solid roller, etc. But as you surmised, that's not what I was looking for.

Thanks for the responses.

paulie

plovett

Posts : 65
Join date : 2009-08-10

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  plovett September 26th 2009, 10:34 am

Would one of these cams be better than the Howards 250/256 cam I originally mentioned?

Lunati 416A3LUN, 276/286 degrees advertised, 247/256 degrees @ 0.050", .612/.619" net lift, 106 LSA.

Lunati 416A4LUN 285/292 degrees advertised, 252/259 degrees @ 0.050", .611/.612" net lift, 108 LSA.

paulie

plovett

Posts : 65
Join date : 2009-08-10

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  Lem Evans September 26th 2009, 10:38 am

Do you have a need for vacuum ? Power brakes ?

Lem Evans

Posts : 7445
Join date : 2008-12-03
Location : Livermore , Ky

http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  plovett September 26th 2009, 10:44 am

Lem Evans wrote:Do you have a need for vacuum ? Power brakes ?

No need for vacuum. I have a manual disc/drum combo in my Cougar.

paulie

plovett

Posts : 65
Join date : 2009-08-10

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  Lem Evans September 26th 2009, 10:57 am

I lean toward the 108* lsa . The duration may be something you and the convertor guys could talk about .

Lem Evans

Posts : 7445
Join date : 2008-12-03
Location : Livermore , Ky

http://bfevansraceparts.com

Back to top Go down

Critique my 460 build Empty Re: Critique my 460 build

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum