Oakley...... 1251 HP 598

Bad to the bone

Details

looks like you got some extra fuel regulators on their for some nos?

Yes it's a NO2 engine, the pulls where made N/A with no juice.

man I would like to see that motor in a outlaw 275 car the bitches would start crying   

A/F not working, I take it?

Those are great numbers... Must be a pretty good Dyno too.    

dfree383 wrote:Bad to the bone

Water cooled checkbook ??  

Nice power..... What heads ......?

Larry T wrote:man I would like to see that motor in a outlaw 275 car the bitches would start crying   

Needs to make a few more oats to be competitive @ weight.

Not dogging the build at all though so please don't take it that way

I'd be happy with that monster in my car!! Badass,but the fat old man in the pic is hard on the eyes!!    

56Tbird wrote:I'd be happy with that monster in my car!! Badass,but the fat old man in the pic is hard on the eyes!!    

Better it should be Curly and not Freelander !!  

yellowhorse7 wrote:

Larry T wrote:man I would like to see that motor in a outlaw 275 car the bitches would start crying   

Needs to make a few more oats to be competitive @ weight.

Not dogging the build at all though so please don't take it that way

Exactly how many oats does one require out if a 598?

hookin78 wrote:Nice power.....    What heads ......?

thor gen II. This is a Top Dragster engine for Div 2. Really proud of power on this one especially with NOS set-up. Has 2 Monte Smith foggers and sure it will make the fields. Thanks guys for the compliments.

how does the thors compare to the c heads are they that much better ? nice power from a small motor -lol

Damn that is nice. Nitrous motor to boot.

badnotch wrote:how does the thors compare to the c heads are they that much better ? nice power from a small motor -lol

I do not have enough info to give you a real good comparison yet but I would guess a lot of it would have to do with application, cui etc. Let me say that the c-heads stuff runs better than the dyno shows. I really think the acceleration rate on the c-head is pretty good. I am excited to see how this engine runs on the track and how tunable it is. Thanks

Oakley Motorsports wrote:

badnotch wrote:how does the thors compare to the c heads are they that much better ? nice power from a small motor -lol

I do not have enough info to give you a real good comparison yet but I would guess a lot of it would have to do with application, cui etc.   Let me say that the c-heads stuff runs better than the dyno shows.  I really think the acceleration rate on the c-head is pretty good.  I am excited to see how this engine runs on the track and how tunable it is.  Thanks

Is the thor head better with nitrous then the c head? I read the c head tune has less room for error then some heads.

dfree383 wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

Larry T wrote:man I would like to see that motor in a outlaw 275 car the bitches would start crying   

Needs to make a few more oats to be competitive @ weight.

Not dogging the build at all though so please don't take it that way

Exactly how many oats does one require out if a 598?

Enough to run the number and take the Q1 position. O/L 275 ain't no joke...

68formalGT wrote:

Oakley Motorsports wrote:

badnotch wrote:how does the thors compare to the c heads are they that much better ? nice power from a small motor -lol

I do not have enough info to give you a real good comparison yet but I would guess a lot of it would have to do with application, cui etc.   Let me say that the c-heads stuff runs better than the dyno shows.  I really think the acceleration rate on the c-head is pretty good.  I am excited to see how this engine runs on the track and how tunable it is.  Thanks

Is the thor head better with nitrous then the c head? I read the c head tune has less room for error then some heads.

I have several c-head engines running spray. The combustion chamber is a hot chamber but we have had no problems. Just need to understand that and make adjustments in the build for it. imo

Oakley Motorsports wrote:

68formalGT wrote:

Oakley Motorsports wrote:

badnotch wrote:how does the thors compare to the c heads are they that much better ? nice power from a small motor -lol

I do not have enough info to give you a real good comparison yet but I would guess a lot of it would have to do with application, cui etc.   Let me say that the c-heads stuff runs better than the dyno shows.  I really think the acceleration rate on the c-head is pretty good.  I am excited to see how this engine runs on the track and how tunable it is.  Thanks

Is the thor head better with nitrous then the c head? I read the c head tune has less room for error then some heads.

I have several c-head engines running spray.  The combustion chamber is a hot chamber but we have had no problems.  Just need to understand that and make adjustments in the build for it. imo

It'll detonate if you don't zero deck it!   

Good job....I'll be lucky to make 1/2 that much power.

yellowhorse7 wrote:

dfree383 wrote:

yellowhorse7 wrote:

Larry T wrote:man I would like to see that motor in a outlaw 275 car the bitches would start crying   

Needs to make a few more oats to be competitive @ weight.

Not dogging the build at all though so please don't take it that way

Exactly how many oats does one require out if a 598?

Enough to run the number and take the Q1 position. O/L 275 ain't no joke...

so you're a number one qualifier?