torquer II to rpm
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
torquer II to rpm
currently have a tII on a 460-274H cam-800dp holley.engine currently holds 17 in vacuum at 1000 rpm idle. What difference in idle quality,and low end torque could I expect switching to a performer RPM ?
Re: torquer II to rpm
I suspect that the cam would change the vac more than the manifold. Do you want the vac to go up or down?
Re: torquer II to rpm
No,I just thought the vacuum might be help ya"ll give me an idea of what a dual plane would do. The TII is what fits under the hood, but a little more low end is what I want.Really dont want to go smaller on the cam and keep the single plane.If I could get a little more bottom end with a manifold change without giving up much on the top(6000 rpm max) Iwould go through the effort to cut the hood up for a scoop.By lookig at the plugs the fuel air distribution at low rpm really is poor on this manifold.I guess it is probably just the way a single plane is.
Re: torquer II to rpm
So, what did the plugs look like at W.O.T. ?meandad wrote:No,I just thought the vacuum might be help ya"ll give me an idea of what a dual plane would do. The TII is what fits under the hood, but a little more low end is what I want.Really dont want to go smaller on the cam and keep the single plane.If I could get a little more bottom end with a manifold change without giving up much on the top(6000 rpm max) Iwould go through the effort to cut the hood up for a scoop.By lookig at the plugs the fuel air distribution at low rpm really is poor on this manifold.I guess it is probably just the way a single plane is.
Re: torquer II to rpm
meandad wrote: currently have a tII on a 460-274H cam-800dp holley.engine currently holds 17 in vacuum at 1000 rpm idle. What difference in idle quality,and low end torque could I expect switching to a performer RPM ?
"Low end" torque has just about a different definition to everyone, lol.
Just above idle the Performer will give much more torque and a lot better response. This will diminish a little at a time till about 3,500 RPM when the Torquer II will take over.
A Performer is an inch lower than an RPM and only slightly taller than a Torquer II. If you're gonna cut the hood - use an "Air Gap".
Re: torquer II to rpm
Lem, the plugs look fine at WOT.At idle the middle four are good but the four corners are rich,exactly opposite of what I would have thought.Funny, but that is how most things in my world work out,opposite of how I think they will ! Randy,I was thinking the Performer RPM might get me a bit better idle and low end without giving up much on top end. Wouldnt a Performer be a bad match for a comp. 274h cam? You all have to excuse me,I often have a hard time conveying my thoughts to others so they understand me.More so on a keyboard.
Re: torquer II to rpm
meandad wrote:Lem, the plugs look fine at WOT.At idle the middle four are good but the four corners are rich,exactly opposite of what I would have thought.Funny, but that is how most things in my world work out,opposite of how I think they will ! Randy,I was thinking the Performer RPM might get me a bit better idle and low end without giving up much on top end. Wouldnt a Performer be a bad match for a comp. 274h cam? You all have to excuse me,I often have a hard time conveying my thoughts to others so they understand me.More so on a keyboard.
As I said, "low end" is subjective. Give RPM ranges and throttle opening so there will be a lot fewer mistakes.
Years ago, I once had a jet boat racer trying to convey to me that he needed more "low end torque" and I could'n't understand what he was talking about originally. Turned out that when he stood on the throttle for WOT it immediately went to 5,800 RPM. To him - "low end" was 6,000 RPM and "high end" was 7,000 RPM.
SO, the term "low end" means absolutely nothing unless you KNOW what THAT person actually means.
Re: torquer II to rpm
Oh.OK,I see,well then by low end I mean just off idle (1000).By 1500 the torque is good.From 2500 to 6000 it is down right scary.It just seems one could improve the idle quality of a bit and gain a few ft.lbs. on idle by getting a more even air -fuel mixture at idle and just off.I guess what I want know is how a low rise single plane compares to a good high rise dual plane on a 460,hood clearance not being an issue. By the way,you know it's just a little imtimadating being just a hobbyist asking you fellows who live, breath and s##t this stuff questions without coming off like a total idiot.But it has been fun reading and learning for the last year or so.
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum