F-150 or F-250?

The higher the cost of the vehicle ,the more you get off

I know for fact that Rob's truck will out do the 6.2 in EVERYTHING but 1/4 dead stop no trailer racing. and Rob's truck will get 17-22 MPG Vs 12-16

They killed the power on the 6.2 four years ago. It was going to be a cylinder deactivation engine but some big shot killed those plans and the ECO Boost was born! The new 6.2 is going to make this one look like a 4 banger lol!!

56Tbird wrote:The higher the cost of the vehicle ,the more you get off

Not touching that with ten foot bear hunting switch.

richter69 wrote:bring the 6.7 down Rob and let me get some tunes for it and get rid of the throttle stop exhaust system..................should even things up a bit.........

Trying to get set up with a secret weapon right now, but I really doubt it will help. I have way too much lard to haul around compared to the Raptor.

4speed wrote:If this goes down...hell I'm gona drive out for the tech seminar! lets get it on
With trailers loaded my vote goes to Rob....

Better get to coming, I got my promoter setting it up, and Don King ain't got nothing on this guy.

Gonna stop messing up Mr. Sherry's thread now, I'll start a new one.
My appologies Mr. Sherry

D's557BBF wrote:I know for fact that Rob's truck will out do the 6.2 in EVERYTHING but 1/4 dead stop no trailer racing. and Rob's truck will get 17-22 MPG Vs 12-16

They killed the power on the 6.2 four years ago. It was going to be a cylinder deactivation engine but some big shot killed those plans and the ECO Boost was born! The new 6.2 is going to make this one look like a 4 banger lol!!

Mr. Bowles was racing the phototype engine years before it was released as the 6.2 for the F-series.........come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it.

Lem Evans wrote:

come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it.

I'm planning on it, I want to get my new truck on the road!!!

D's557BBF wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:

come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it.

I'm planning on it, I want to get my new truck on the road!!!

A new 7.3? I thought they quit making those?

Lem Evans wrote:

D's557BBF wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:

come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it.

I'm planning on it, I want to get my new truck on the road!!!

A new 7.3? I thought they quit making those?

yeah I wish they did still make them

Lem do the new trucks have a PISS tank like the new Chevies for the Exhaust?

Yep Coug, they do have the urea tank.

the Coug wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:

D's557BBF wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:

come to the tech deal and i'm sure he will tell you about it.

I'm planning on it, I want to get my new truck on the road!!!

A new 7.3? I thought they quit making those?

yeah I wish they did still make them

Lem do the new trucks have a PISS tank like the new Chevies for the Exhaust?

6.2 aint got but one tank......and I wish they still made '66 Mustang convertables

Well that counts me out of owning one then or if I do it will be Freakin removed and Shyt canned, I ain't payin $12 bucks a gallon for Piss to put in a truck....

the Coug wrote:Well that counts me out of owning one then or if I do it will be Freakin removed and Shyt canned, I ain't payin $12 bucks a gallon for Piss to put in a truck....

lol....... damn you bitch about everything .....its for the envirorment

richter69 wrote:bring the 6.7 down Rob and let me get some tunes for it and get rid of the throttle stop exhaust system..................should even things up a bit.........

foot brake this beast in 4wh and let her eat ......... faster then a coyote

put it in 4wd low and it will out 60' your mustang...................

Lem Evans wrote:

6.2 aint got but one tank......and I wish they still made '66 Mustang convertables

I'd be much happier with a new '69 Mach I.

Casual Towing towing under 10k and everyday using the truck around town..... Get the 6.2 Gas Engine, Towing for REAL and using a truck for real work.... Get the Diesel. Diesels need to be worked and used if you don;t they are nothing but trouble.

dfree383 wrote:Diesels need to be worked and used if you don;t they are nothing but trouble.

This is a false statement, the problems we see are in no way related to how one is used, how they are maintained can have some bearing as well as abuse, most of it though is just from poor design to begin with. EPA restrictions also plays a big role.