4 link setting
+4
bbf-falcon
cool40
richter69
Moodyblues
8 posters
Page 1 of 1
4 link setting
Ok I have a 77 Mustang II. Full chassis car. 499 BBF built by Da Snake and it's got the horses. 1.76 glide, 4.88 gear. 8 inch 5500 stall Best pass so far has been 5.63/125.
With this stall I need to leave at 4600 off the brake. I left at 4400 and the car stood straight up. The 5.63 pass was leaving at 4000. The better the track the more violent the car gets, it's pulling the front end and driving the car right on launch. Local track it seems to be ok at 4000 launch just pulling the front end about a foot but still going straight, better track it goes right. My goal is to get the car to leave without pulling the car over 3 inches.
I weighed the car on digital scales and posted below are the results:
LF. 588. RF 585
LR 570. RR 600
Cross 1158. IC. 49.29
Front bias% .504
Rear bias%. .503
Left side bias%. .497
Right side bias% .509
On the top bars I moved up one hole from the bottom hole from these readings. On the bottom hole the IC was 49.05
I'm hoping this will help keep the frontend down. It probably needs a flat of pre-load but one thing at a time. I weigh 220 lbs
Thoughts?
With this stall I need to leave at 4600 off the brake. I left at 4400 and the car stood straight up. The 5.63 pass was leaving at 4000. The better the track the more violent the car gets, it's pulling the front end and driving the car right on launch. Local track it seems to be ok at 4000 launch just pulling the front end about a foot but still going straight, better track it goes right. My goal is to get the car to leave without pulling the car over 3 inches.
I weighed the car on digital scales and posted below are the results:
LF. 588. RF 585
LR 570. RR 600
Cross 1158. IC. 49.29
Front bias% .504
Rear bias%. .503
Left side bias%. .497
Right side bias% .509
On the top bars I moved up one hole from the bottom hole from these readings. On the bottom hole the IC was 49.05
I'm hoping this will help keep the frontend down. It probably needs a flat of pre-load but one thing at a time. I weigh 220 lbs
Thoughts?
Re: 4 link setting
are the numbers with you in the seat, full of fuel etc?
do you have an anti rollbar?
do you have an anti rollbar?
richter69- Posts : 13649
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 53
Location : In the winners circle
Re: 4 link setting
i'm sure no 4-link guy but i'd think with your corner weights it should work good.shock/strut settings,tire roll out,and even wheelbase can cause your problems.first thing i'd do is make sure the rearend is square in the car.
cool40- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 7313
Join date : 2009-08-31
Age : 53
Location : on the 1/8 mile dyno
Re: 4 link setting
you need to be in it, or at least your equivalent anyway.
richter69- Posts : 13649
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 53
Location : In the winners circle
Re: 4 link setting
richter69 wrote:you need to be in it, or at least your equivalent anyway.
I'm not a suspension guy in any way shape or form,but i've always been told exactly that.
bbf-falcon- Posts : 8995
Join date : 2008-12-03
Location : Jackson, Ohio
Re: 4 link setting
Does the car have shocks or struts on the front, and is their extension valving adjustable? If so how tight/loose is the front valving currently set from "full tight"? If they are on the loose side of their extension valving range you can try to tighten the extension some. This might help to slow the nose coming up as fast.
Does the car have wheelie bars that you can use to help generate some wheel speed and aid in keeping the nose down?
If no wheelie bars do the rear shocks have any valving adjustability? If so and if they have the extension valving currently set on the looser side of it's total range, you can try to tighten up the extension a little (to slow down the speed of initial hit some). This might help to generate some more initial wheel speed, and help keep the nose lower.
If the front & rear shocks/shocks (or struts/shocks) are already adjusted with their extension valving at/near full tight, you can try to generate some additional wheel speed another way by increasing the air pressure a little each pass until the nose starts coming down.
Having big torque/power to work with on a big tired car doesn't automatically mean a longer I/C will always be better. Some of the Outlaw Pro Mods around here run an I/C as short as 40-45", and some run way out around the 75-80" (or more) range, and some are somewhere in the middle. But then some of these guys do have electric shocks and start the pass with the shocks locked out at full-tight. So in some cases their actual working I/C has much less effect on the car/launch.....down track it's another story though when the timers back the shocks off and the I/C comes back into play and more active.
And of course if you run out of usable chassis adjustment to work with and have a MSD digital box you could always fudge the timing around at the start of the pass to help keep the nose down.
The crooked launch just sounds like either the side-to-side preload is off a little, or possibly staggered slick rollout/staggered air pressure numbers. If it's a preload deal either adjust one of the top 4-link bar's length a little, or adjust one of the anti-roll link's length a little. It could also be caused by incorrect (or unwanted) wheelie bar height stagger too if you have w/bars. If you're setting the initial side to side preload setting with the car on jack stands (the "hanging method") you don't need the driver's weight in the car (because the car is on stands). If you're setting the initial preload with the car on the ground (or on "set-up" blocks) the car needs to have the total race weight in the car (fuel, water, oil, & driver weight).
Does the car have wheelie bars that you can use to help generate some wheel speed and aid in keeping the nose down?
If no wheelie bars do the rear shocks have any valving adjustability? If so and if they have the extension valving currently set on the looser side of it's total range, you can try to tighten up the extension a little (to slow down the speed of initial hit some). This might help to generate some more initial wheel speed, and help keep the nose lower.
If the front & rear shocks/shocks (or struts/shocks) are already adjusted with their extension valving at/near full tight, you can try to generate some additional wheel speed another way by increasing the air pressure a little each pass until the nose starts coming down.
Having big torque/power to work with on a big tired car doesn't automatically mean a longer I/C will always be better. Some of the Outlaw Pro Mods around here run an I/C as short as 40-45", and some run way out around the 75-80" (or more) range, and some are somewhere in the middle. But then some of these guys do have electric shocks and start the pass with the shocks locked out at full-tight. So in some cases their actual working I/C has much less effect on the car/launch.....down track it's another story though when the timers back the shocks off and the I/C comes back into play and more active.
And of course if you run out of usable chassis adjustment to work with and have a MSD digital box you could always fudge the timing around at the start of the pass to help keep the nose down.
The crooked launch just sounds like either the side-to-side preload is off a little, or possibly staggered slick rollout/staggered air pressure numbers. If it's a preload deal either adjust one of the top 4-link bar's length a little, or adjust one of the anti-roll link's length a little. It could also be caused by incorrect (or unwanted) wheelie bar height stagger too if you have w/bars. If you're setting the initial side to side preload setting with the car on jack stands (the "hanging method") you don't need the driver's weight in the car (because the car is on stands). If you're setting the initial preload with the car on the ground (or on "set-up" blocks) the car needs to have the total race weight in the car (fuel, water, oil, & driver weight).
DILLIGASDAVE- Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"
Re
Pardon my ignorance, but could someone educate me please? I understand the LF, LR, RR, RF weights and how the bias % is caluclated, but what is the cross and the IC and how are they calculated. Also someone mentioned an anti-roll bar, can someone post up a picture of a 4 link setup with an anti roll bar installed. Finally are there any good books on setting up a 4 link suspension?
LF. 588. RF 585
LR 570. RR 600
Cross 1158. IC. 49.29
Front bias% .504
Rear bias%. .503
Left side bias%. .497
Right side bias% .509
LF. 588. RF 585
LR 570. RR 600
Cross 1158. IC. 49.29
Front bias% .504
Rear bias%. .503
Left side bias%. .497
Right side bias% .509
Re: 4 link setting
DILLIGASDAVE wrote:Does the car have shocks or struts on the front, and is their extension valving adjustable? If so how tight/loose is the front valving currently set from "full tight"? If they are on the loose side of their extension valving range you can try to tighten the extension some. This might help to slow the nose coming up as fast.
I will have to check the front adjustments. It has a full strut frontend.
Does the car have wheelie bars that you can use to help generate some wheel speed and aid in keeping the nose down?
They are spring loaded and cant get them to stiften up, getting new ones.
If no wheelie bars do the rear shocks have any valving adjustability? If so and if they have the extension valving currently set on the looser side of it's total range, you can try to tighten up the extension a little (to slow down the speed of initial hit some). This might help to generate some more initial wheel speed, and help keep the nose lower.
If the front & rear shocks/shocks (or struts/shocks) are already adjusted with their extension valving at/near full tight, you can try to generate some additional wheel speed another way by increasing the air pressure a little each pass until the nose starts coming down.
Having big torque/power to work with on a big tired car doesn't automatically mean a longer I/C will always be better. Some of the Outlaw Pro Mods around here run an I/C as short as 40-45", and some run way out around the 75-80" (or more) range, and some are somewhere in the middle. But then some of these guys do have electric shocks and start the pass with the shocks locked out at full-tight. So in some cases their actual working I/C has much less effect on the car/launch.....down track it's another story though when the timers back the shocks off and the I/C comes back into play and more active.
the shocks are double adj and the setting is 4 clicks on the bottom and not sure about the top, a couple of turns it seems.
And of course if you run out of usable chassis adjustment to work with and have a MSD digital box you could always fudge the timing around at the start of the pass to help keep the nose down.
The crooked launch just sounds like either the side-to-side preload is off a little, or possibly staggered slick rollout/staggered air pressure numbers. If it's a preload deal either adjust one of the top 4-link bar's length a little, or adjust one of the anti-roll link's length a little. It could also be caused by incorrect (or unwanted) wheelie bar height stagger too if you have w/bars. If you're setting the initial side to side preload setting with the car on jack stands (the "hanging method") you don't need the driver's weight in the car (because the car is on stands). If you're setting the initial preload with the car on the ground (or on "set-up" blocks) the car needs to have the total race weight in the car (fuel, water, oil, & driver weight).
The rear end is dead set on. Car as gone straight as a arrow with 700hp but now that the hp has increased it doesnt like it.
Re: 4 link setting
HorsinAround wrote:Pardon my ignorance, but could someone educate me please? I understand the LF, LR, RR, RF weights and how the bias % is caluclated, but what is the cross and the IC and how are they calculated. Also someone mentioned an anti-roll bar, can someone post up a picture of a 4 link setup with an anti roll bar installed. Finally are there any good books on setting up a 4 link suspension?
LF. 588. RF 585
LR 570. RR 600
Cross 1158. IC. 49.29
Front bias% .504
Rear bias%. .503
Left side bias%. .497
Right side bias% .509
The IC is the center balance of the car. In my case the center is at 49.29 meaning if I am correct the rear has a little more weight than the front. I have used Jerry Bickle's chassis tunning book. I am basically a rookie at this.
Re: 4 link setting
cool40 wrote:i'm sure no 4-link guy but i'd think with your corner weights it should work good.shock/strut settings,tire roll out,and even wheelbase can cause your problems.first thing i'd do is make sure the rearend is square in the car.
Lee the rear is square, been checked. WB is 105". I think I'm close, gonna make some test runs on friday night.
Re: 4 link setting
Have you checked rollout? Swapped tires side to side to see if that makes a difference?
jbozzelle- Posts : 3705
Join date : 2009-08-10
Age : 50
Location : New Orleans
Re: 4 link setting
Are we talking 4 clicks starting from full-loose, or 4 clicks starting from full-tight? This can often be a point of confusion since people don't always start counting from the same starting point.Moodyblues wrote:..........and the setting is 4 clicks on the bottom............
A car's I/C (instant center) is the actual (with a ladder bar) or theoretical (with a 4-link) pivot/leverage point in the rear suspension where two opposing actions happen at the same time during the launch. (A) the rear suspension tries to lift the car upward from this pivot/leverage point, and (B) the rear suspension tries to push/plant the slick's tread & sidewall downward into the track surface from this pivot/leverage point. A ladder bar's I/C is the front rod-end, a 4-links I/C is the theoretical point where the top & bottom bar's centerlines would cross each other if their centerlines were extended forward.HorsinAround wrote:...........what is the IC and how are they calculated..........
A car's C/G (center of gravity) is the theoretical balance point in a car where it would balance perfectly if hung from that point. The C/G's front/rear placement is calculated by weighing the front of the car vs the rear of the car. The height off the ground of the C/G is a little harder to calculate. But a number of drag chassis books out there say to just use at/around the height of the cam shaft off the ground as a good guess.
DILLIGASDAVE- Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"
Re: 4 link setting
DILLIGASDAVE wrote:Are we talking 4 clicks starting from full-loose, or 4 clicks starting from full-tight? This can often be a point of confusion since people don't always start counting from the same starting point.Moodyblues wrote:..........and the setting is 4 clicks on the bottom............A car's I/C (instant center) is the actual (with a ladder bar) or theoretical (with a 4-link) pivot/leverage point in the rear suspension where two opposing actions happen at the same time during the launch. (A) the rear suspension tries to lift the car upward from this pivot/leverage point, and (B) the rear suspension tries to push/plant the slick's tread & sidewall downward into the track surface from this pivot/leverage point. A ladder bar's I/C is the front rod-end, a 4-links I/C is the theoretical point where the top & bottom bar's centerlines would cross each other if their centerlines were extended forward.HorsinAround wrote:...........what is the IC and how are they calculated..........
A car's C/G (center of gravity) is the theoretical balance point in a car where it would balance perfectly if hung from that point. The C/G's front/rear placement is calculated by weighing the front of the car vs the rear of the car. The height off the ground of the C/G is a little harder to calculate. But a number of drag chassis books out there say to just use at/around the height of the cam shaft off the ground as a good guess.
Dave I am showing my ignorance here........4 clicks from the bottom out of 12, so Im guessing 4 clicks from loose? I will check the Koni manual
Re: 4 link setting
jbozzelle wrote:Have you checked rollout? Swapped tires side to side to see if that makes a difference?
Yes, the rollout is the same on the Hoosiers. I had Goodyears on it before and the left tire was 1" less rollout and I had to turn it a flat and that setting is still there. I guess negative preload.
Re: 4 link setting
Not ignorance, it's a common deal. Everyone doesn't always agree where to start counting shock clicks/window-sweeps because not every shock maker out there does things exactly the same way. For example while both Santhuff & Koni have a similar looking top adjustment window-sweep assembly for their extension valving, they both don't spin the same direction to reach full-tight. And finding the 100% "full-loose" setting on a D/A Santhuff can be hard to do anyway. The ones I have worked with don't have the built in stops you would expect to find after say 15-16 clicks. Once you go past 18+ clicks you start to worry you might spin the adjuster assembly out of the shock by mistake if you go any further.Moodyblues wrote:Dave I am showing my ignorance here........4 clicks from the bottom out of 12, so Im guessing 4 clicks from loose? I will check the Koni manual
Another reason everyone doesn't agree were to start counting from is just because everyone doesn't agree were to start a car's initial chassis setup the first time out. Some guys start with everything set at full-loose, so it stands to reason they would be more likely to start counting from there. And some guys start with everything set full-tight first time out and start counting from there.
DILLIGASDAVE- Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"
Re: 4 link setting
DilligasDave is a smart dude, and knows his stuff. As he mentioned...shock settings are sometimes really difficult to "explain", and I've never understood why all manufacturers cannot make them the same way. Anyways, its going right sometimes, because it now it has more power, which is forcing the left tire into the ground harder, creating more traction, driving it to the right. Like you said, one thing at a time...thats for later.
To help with wheel stands, keep listening to Dave. We'll both tell you the same thing, so I'll let him do the typing. Tighten front extension, lengthen/lower IC on 4-link, etc.
To help with wheel stands, keep listening to Dave. We'll both tell you the same thing, so I'll let him do the typing. Tighten front extension, lengthen/lower IC on 4-link, etc.
Re: 4 link setting
I gotta learn this stuff because I am going to a 598 in a couple years. I appreciate everyone's advice and help. Picked up some digital scales and Jerry Bickel software. I am going to try the front tightening and 4- link adj.
Re: 4 link setting
Ok got an update here........
Got some digital scales and Jerry Bickel software.
The I/c on the car is 51.7. Engine is 14.5" high. Adj wheel base I'd location of the engine is 100.7 (103" wb on center wheel).
Changed the holes of the brackets on what Bickel said they should be. Added a flat of preload.
Car left pretty good and carried the wheels through the 60 and set it down pretty easy but I could tell I was a hair away from a wheel stand. Had a chassis guy tell me the engine height and the engine too far back in the car, it would not work with any adjustment.
Your thoughts?
Got some digital scales and Jerry Bickel software.
The I/c on the car is 51.7. Engine is 14.5" high. Adj wheel base I'd location of the engine is 100.7 (103" wb on center wheel).
Changed the holes of the brackets on what Bickel said they should be. Added a flat of preload.
Car left pretty good and carried the wheels through the 60 and set it down pretty easy but I could tell I was a hair away from a wheel stand. Had a chassis guy tell me the engine height and the engine too far back in the car, it would not work with any adjustment.
Your thoughts?
Re: 4 link setting
weight on the nose....
richter69- Posts : 13649
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 53
Location : In the winners circle
Re: 4 link setting
With the adjustment the other night it went 5.63/121 leaving on 4000 chip, 8 lbs air in tires. If I could leave at 4600-4800 this thing would run pretty good.
Re: 4 link setting
you will be shocked at what 5-10 pds will do........
richter69- Posts : 13649
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 53
Location : In the winners circle
Re: 4 link setting
richter69 wrote:you will be shocked at what 5-10 pds will do........
I will try this
Similar topics
» torque arm 3 link VS 4 link
» Rad Cap pressure setting
» Setting the motor low as possible?
» setting roller rockers
» inital timing setting
» Rad Cap pressure setting
» Setting the motor low as possible?
» setting roller rockers
» inital timing setting
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum