Tunnel ram / plenum question
+2
BBFTorino
JBR-3
6 posters
Page 1 of 1
Tunnel ram / plenum question
.
Last edited by JBR-3 on October 17th 2020, 3:09 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : .)
JBR-3- Posts : 266
Join date : 2009-08-17
Re: Tunnel ram / plenum question
I don't know what it would mean as far as power production, but it would be an interesting comparison to see.
Consider that the old school stack type of mechanical injection, and even the Inglese, or Webber carbureted setup's use a carb venturi (or injector) for each cylinder, and when they are tuned in just right, they are very reactive and make great power.
The situation you are describing would be the halfway point between these two setups.
Consider that the old school stack type of mechanical injection, and even the Inglese, or Webber carbureted setup's use a carb venturi (or injector) for each cylinder, and when they are tuned in just right, they are very reactive and make great power.
The situation you are describing would be the halfway point between these two setups.
BBFTorino- Posts : 999
Join date : 2015-12-31
Re: Tunnel ram / plenum question
It would probably be a given amount closer to acting like the old school IR tunnel ram setups they tried back in the early days of Pro Stock than an open plenum tunnel ram can/does (4 cylinders pulling on each carb venturi vs 8 cylinders pulling on each carb venturi). But it still wouldn't be the same as a true IR setup.
DILLIGASDAVE- Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"
Re: Tunnel ram / plenum question
JBR-3 wrote:What would be the effect if you divided the plenum in half, front to back ?
The front 4 cylinders, 1-2-5-6, would feed from one carb and the rear 4, 3-4-7-8, would
feed from the rear carb.
I know that when #1 intake valve opens, that port certainly does not feed from the secondaries on the rear carb.
If there is an advantage, I could see smaller plenums and possibly better carb transient reponse.
Maybe this has already been done and I don't know the term for it.
Note: firing order is 1-5-4-2-6-3-7-8.
Some older Weiand "Hi-Ram" intakes had open spacers over the 4 bunched runners which did exactly that when using Dominator carbs. Just enough plenum to dampen the pulses so it was not actually individual runners.
They ran OK on some early Pro Stock engines but, nothing like today's options.
Re: Tunnel ram / plenum question
.
Last edited by JBR-3 on October 17th 2020, 3:10 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : .)
JBR-3- Posts : 266
Join date : 2009-08-17
T Ram
If you tried that I'd use carbs that are one to one linkage style like the Holley # 4224 Center Squirter 660 CFM units. Or the 750 CFM version. More even flow across 4 runners, better balance.
blown473- Posts : 376
Join date : 2009-11-12
Age : 64
Similar topics
» TFS Old Style Tunnel Ram Plenum Spacer
» Increasing Plenum Volume on TFS A460 Tunnel Ram? Cheap power or waste of time?
» Tunnel Ram Question...
» Weiand Tunnel Ram Question
» 4150 Holley Carb Tunnel Ram Tuning Question
» Increasing Plenum Volume on TFS A460 Tunnel Ram? Cheap power or waste of time?
» Tunnel Ram Question...
» Weiand Tunnel Ram Question
» 4150 Holley Carb Tunnel Ram Tuning Question
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum