BIG BLOCK FORD
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

+4
the Coug
Wayne Pearce
511Fox
Maddmattmustangs
8 posters

Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  Maddmattmustangs February 25th 2010, 12:03 pm

Ive been wondering what is the diffrence in performance and engine life between a 6.700 and 6.800 rod on a 545 stroker?
Is there anything at all?

aluminum rods?

steel rods?

pros and cons of each?

sorry this post is so vauge but Ive just been wondering about these things for awhile now... confused
Maddmattmustangs
Maddmattmustangs

Posts : 1201
Join date : 2010-02-15
Age : 34
Location : Berryville, Arkansas

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Aluminum Rods

Post  511Fox February 25th 2010, 1:19 pm

I am an expert by no stretch of the imagination.

However we can learn from others mistakes.

I have never heard of anyone having good luck with aluminum rods on the street.

How about Titanium Question

511Fox

Posts : 251
Join date : 2010-02-20
Age : 53
Location : Near Mansfield/Norwalk Ohio

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  Wayne Pearce February 26th 2010, 4:39 pm

My (biased) opinion is to use a 6.8 rod as it keeps a little more of the wrist pin in the cylinder at bottom dead center, hey - a .100 is a .100 - it all helps.

Wayne (SAWDOFF) Pearce


Last edited by Wayne Pearce on February 26th 2010, 4:40 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : typo)

Wayne Pearce

Posts : 658
Join date : 2009-08-19
Age : 81
Location : Greenfield Center, New York

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  Maddmattmustangs March 2nd 2010, 10:25 am

Wayne Pearce wrote:My (biased) opinion is to use a 6.8 rod as it keeps a little more of the wrist pin in the cylinder at bottom dead center, hey - a .100 is a .100 - it all helps.

Wayne (SAWDOFF) Pearce

Doesnt that also help with side loading in the cylinder as well?
Im just trying to educate myself alittle more so im picking everyones brains here cheers
Maddmattmustangs
Maddmattmustangs

Posts : 1201
Join date : 2010-02-15
Age : 34
Location : Berryville, Arkansas

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  the Coug March 2nd 2010, 11:42 am

511Fox wrote:I am an expert by no stretch of the imagination.

However we can learn from others mistakes.

I have never heard of anyone having good luck with aluminum rods on the street.

How about Titanium Question


the Titanium is a little Pricy last time I looked they were in the range of $3000 to $5000 a set seems you can put that money somewhere more useful.....


Randy
the Coug
the Coug

Posts : 3055
Join date : 2008-12-02

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  richter69 March 2nd 2010, 12:25 pm

aluminum has its place, you aint there yet. A good 6.8 h beam with some 2000 series bolts will go a long ways.
richter69
richter69

Posts : 13649
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 53
Location : In the winners circle

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  the Coug March 2nd 2010, 12:26 pm

richter69 wrote:aluminum has its place, you aint there yet. A good 6.8 h beam with some 2000 series bolts will go a long ways.


Yep they will take 1000+ hp n/p



Randy
the Coug
the Coug

Posts : 3055
Join date : 2008-12-02

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  torkair March 2nd 2010, 2:17 pm

The longer rod also makes for a shorter piston and thus less reciprocating mass. A few grams here and there goes a hell of a long way to making a stronger motor!
torkair
torkair

Posts : 404
Join date : 2009-08-27
Age : 40
Location : Tucson, Az

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  DaveMcLain March 3rd 2010, 9:21 am

The differences between using a 6.700 or a 6.800 rod length when it comes to cylinder wall loading will be non existent. The difference in piston weight between one or the other for a given stroke, negligible and if you're running a dish piston said dish can be deeper if needed if the rod is made shorter. Aluminum rods will have excellent bearing life at loadings where steel rods will not. Very high rpm, forced induction etc are applications where it's MUCH better to have an aluminum rod in the engine. While they are sacrificial other areas in the engine will last much better.

Connecting rods are an area of compromise and overkill accomplishes nothing. For instance I like using that Scat I beam rod in a lot of engines because it's less expensive and plenty strong for many applications. Money saved can be spent elsewhere where it'll help performance.

DaveMcLain

Posts : 399
Join date : 2009-09-15

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  Curt March 3rd 2010, 10:21 am

richter69 wrote:aluminum has its place,


Thats right Fabio, in show cars. LOL albino
Curt
Curt

Posts : 2791
Join date : 2009-02-08
Age : 62
Location : Henrietta, Texas but mostly on the road

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  Maddmattmustangs March 3rd 2010, 10:29 am

thanks guys just trying to cut through all the propoganda Very Happy
I probably will never have a need for an aluminum rod much less titanium Shocked
Maddmattmustangs
Maddmattmustangs

Posts : 1201
Join date : 2010-02-15
Age : 34
Location : Berryville, Arkansas

Back to top Go down

Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please? Empty Re: Connecting rods 6.700 vs 6.800... aluminum VS steel insight please?

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum