Help w/friend's car

[quote="windsor"]

DanH wrote:I'd say the ET & MPH match the dyno sheet.to the car weight.

like said need a better engine top end w/cam, but then it is a street ride

I'd think with the power it made it should be a few (maybe a couple) of tenths and MPH better than it is....that's what we're trying to find.   But, hey, it is what it is![/quote

The Dyno numbers. OK . so if it had a P/G in the car or a C6 the dyno numbers say what it will/should run??????????????????????

I see what you're saying. Personally, I'd say with his C4, yes, it should be a bit faster. Just my opinion.

dfree383 wrote:C4 and 3.89's are fine, I'd like to see a taller slick and get rid of the gear vendors unit. But that's just me.

I agree on your points. Can't run any bigger tire, though. It's maxed out.

dfree383 wrote:

windsor wrote:

dfree383 wrote:C4 and 3.89's are fine, I'd like to see a taller slick and get rid of the gear vendors unit. But that's just me.

I agree on your points. Can't run any bigger tire, though.  It's maxed out.  

Taller not wider

maxed our in all directions.

Some calculators to plug the dyno HP + 1/8-1/4 mile MPH & ET numbers into.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculators.htm

DILLIGASDAVE wrote:Some calculators to plug the dyno HP + 1/8-1/4 mile MPH & ET numbers into.

http://www.wallaceracing.com/Calculators.htm

Thanks Dave. Those are the ones I always use.

Headers I'd say no, pipes were actually tad smaller.

exhaust yes- 4" with mufflers on the dyno.

dfree383 wrote:That's a big part of the problem

Yep, hopefully gonna do a test with open headers and see what that does.