Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
+63
G-Code
mitch huested
away
torino501
427John
CDMBill
Carbguy
jasonf
SandHillsHillbilly
cletus66
BOSS 429
Lukesportsman
738drvr
Ol'Blue77
Mikejc
6t6mustang
MidnightbluS10
psfracer
c.evans
res0rli9
terryk105
IDT-572
stanger68
BBF552
Dave De
HorsinAround
BigBlockRanger
ED468
fordsrgrt
nitrous.f
Carl
windsor
boss9coupe
Mark Miller
nuclearcobra
Stimie
Curt
Mark O'Neal
cobrakid8
Coupe Devil
whatbumper
STR-LGL-70
DGS
Gary Blair
glenevans
Paul Kane
litshoot
68formalGT
hbstang
jonkaase
68galaxie
JBR-3
dfree383
nascar429
TravisRice
rmcomprandy
jbozzelle
BBFTorino
wayney
bruno
Lem Evans
enginetech
Doug Rahn
67 posters
Page 6 of 12
Page 6 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 10, 11, 12
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
I know this is pretty much unbelievable, but this went past our goal. First sheet is with cam at 113, second is at 116. Timing at 28. It took 5 runs before these sheets to get the carbs right. 6 cylinders were way rich and the front two needed fuel. It would be hard to figure out without all 8 O2 sensors on the primary pipes. Special thanks to Billy Godbold at Comp Cams for making 2 new lobes for me. This engine has 179 gram steel intake valves, stud rockers with no stud girdle, and Manley Nextek dual springs with 250# on the seat and 750# open. Trend 3/8 pushrods, .135 wall. It still sounds like it wants more at 8100. Since we were going over 8000 rpm I started it a little higher than the other runs. Peak torque was below the starting RPM.
jonkaase- Posts : 81
Join date : 2009-08-10
Mark Miller likes this post
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
What fuel are you using for the 598 tests?
BBF552- Posts : 34
Join date : 2014-08-17
Age : 38
Location : Charles City, Virginia
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
Dave De wrote:The stud bosses on these heads seem to be higher than the P-51's. This makes the rocker trunnion closer to the base of the stud where its going to be stronger from side loading. Push rod lengths are much longer at 9.400 and 9.450.
Piston valve relief clearance
My Diamond piston reliefs were cut for modified P-51's with 2.300" diameter intake valves. The valves on the SR-71's are 2.375" where I expected interference. I checked the clearance to find that it has .160" radial clearance in the relief. This tells me that the valve centerline is closer to the piston center than the P-51 head. Those of you that have pistons with reliefs for SCJ/P-51's with 2.25" valves should have less clearance to something around .130" which is acceptable clearance where you wont have to cut the pistons. But you need to check it to make sure.
Thanks for the info. Been pondering a set of the SR-71s and a cam swap on my 514 here soon... Good to know the pistons may be able to stay in the block...
jbozzelle- Posts : 3705
Join date : 2009-08-10
Age : 50
Location : New Orleans
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
2 horsepower per cubic inch is nothing to sneeze at from the 598 test mule!
jbozzelle- Posts : 3705
Join date : 2009-08-10
Age : 50
Location : New Orleans
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
BBF552 wrote:What fuel are you using for the 598 tests?
X2- I was wondering the same thing. Is this with alcohol or gas?
stanger68- Posts : 500
Join date : 2015-12-05
Location : Birmingham, Al
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
This is a maximum effort for sure. So the fuel is VP, Q-16. It's the best fuel I've ever seen for not hurting parts. Too much timing? just less power. Too lean, like over 16 to 1 air/fuel? no problem. C-16 VP is about the same power. But on this engine with 16 to 1 compression, C-12 or C-14 VP would probably hurt the rings
jonkaase- Posts : 81
Join date : 2009-08-10
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
Jon,
I read through all of the posts for some idea of the cam specs you used but didn't see anything. Could you give us some specifics w/o going too much in detail? I just picked up some C heads and am almost kicking myself for the cost diff vs hp gain compared to the sr71 heads with being able to use the manifolds, headers, etc I already own.
Thanks, Sheldon
I read through all of the posts for some idea of the cam specs you used but didn't see anything. Could you give us some specifics w/o going too much in detail? I just picked up some C heads and am almost kicking myself for the cost diff vs hp gain compared to the sr71 heads with being able to use the manifolds, headers, etc I already own.
Thanks, Sheldon
STR-LGL-70- Posts : 223
Join date : 2009-08-06
Age : 61
Location : Daytona FL
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
The C heads ported right are a good 100 better. so don't worry. the cam is Comp, 287-312 at .050 115 CL, .483" lobe lift.
jonkaase- Posts : 81
Join date : 2009-08-10
jonkaase- Posts : 81
Join date : 2009-08-10
Mark Miller likes this post
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
Looks like them...
jbozzelle- Posts : 3705
Join date : 2009-08-10
Age : 50
Location : New Orleans
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
Your ideas are incredible , Even your P38's , I put them on a 86 junk yard 5.0 short block with a small flat hyd cam 244@.050 and 534 lift and ran 10.80 at 121 mph with a 125 shot at 3050lb tripping the 60' box on the rear tires , and have been equally impressed with the SCJ's outta the box on a solid flat tappet flat top piston 472 and the P51's on a solid flat tappet 552 So thanks for all the killer creations you offer us , I think i might have to get a set of these SR71's to help with my hoarding hobby
Last edited by nuclearcobra on November 10th 2018, 8:27 am; edited 1 time in total
nuclearcobra- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 1385
Join date : 2009-08-16
Location : Delaware Coast
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
Jon, will you have a stud girdle in time to test on this engine. Be a great one to see if there is some power to be had with one.
IDT-572- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 4628
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 63
Location : Shelbyville Tn.
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
IDT-572 wrote:Jon, will you have a stud girdle in time to test on this engine. Be a great one to see if there is some power to be had with one.
Curious about this too...
jbozzelle- Posts : 3705
Join date : 2009-08-10
Age : 50
Location : New Orleans
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
Fantastic results John.
The AFR 315 heads have a 3.44 square inch CSA minimum (published)
How do the P51 and SR-71 heads compare.
Doing some PipeMax work and am curious about port sizing.
Cheers!
The AFR 315 heads have a 3.44 square inch CSA minimum (published)
How do the P51 and SR-71 heads compare.
Doing some PipeMax work and am curious about port sizing.
Cheers!
68galaxie- Posts : 351
Join date : 2010-04-13
Location : Edmonton AB
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
I will try to do some measuring for you.
jonkaase- Posts : 81
Join date : 2009-08-10
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
jonkaase wrote:The C heads ported right are a good 100 better.
Hi Jon
Where will the SR71 be with porting? and what about your A460?
Cheers
Terry
terryk105- Posts : 1
Join date : 2018-11-09
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
i checked some sizes of intake ports. The areas figured in the corner radius’s. The P-51 and SR-71 heads have more corner radius in the roof than the AFR ‘s and that is figured in. Overall the sq in area is hard to measure but these are close
AFR. Pushrod pinch, 2.12 x 1.73, 3.45 sq in. Short turn, 1.9 x 2.16, 3.8 sq in. (Height x width)
P-51. 2.1 x 1.78 3.45. 1.9 x 2.15. 3.63
SR-71. 2.3 x 1.85. 4.04. 2.15 x 2.3. 4.41
AFR. Pushrod pinch, 2.12 x 1.73, 3.45 sq in. Short turn, 1.9 x 2.16, 3.8 sq in. (Height x width)
P-51. 2.1 x 1.78 3.45. 1.9 x 2.15. 3.63
SR-71. 2.3 x 1.85. 4.04. 2.15 x 2.3. 4.41
jonkaase- Posts : 81
Join date : 2009-08-10
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
Sorry but listing this at home on my Ipad, it scooted all the numbers together and I can’t edit it back
jonkaase- Posts : 81
Join date : 2009-08-10
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
jonkaase wrote:i checked some sizes of intake ports. The areas figured in the corner radius’s. The P-51 and SR-71 heads have more corner radius in the roof than the AFR ‘s and that is figured in. Overall the sq in area is hard to measure but these are close
AFR. Pushrod pinch, 2.12 x 1.73, 3.45 sq in. Short turn, 1.9 x 2.16, 3.8 sq in. (Height x width)
P-51. 2.1 x 1.78 3.45. 1.9 x 2.15. 3.63
SR-71. 2.3 x 1.85. 4.04. 2.15 x 2.3. 4.41
Thank you!!
68galaxie- Posts : 351
Join date : 2010-04-13
Location : Edmonton AB
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
I see more engine masters victory's
res0rli9- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 3352
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 74
Location : sarasota FL.
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
To Blake and J. Bozelle,
I sent an assembled SR-71 head to Jon Best at Jomar a couple of weeks ago. They are making the stud girdles now and have a P/N assigned for the SR-71 heads.
I sent an assembled SR-71 head to Jon Best at Jomar a couple of weeks ago. They are making the stud girdles now and have a P/N assigned for the SR-71 heads.
c.evans- BBF VENDOR SPONSOR
- Posts : 2260
Join date : 2008-12-03
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
I saw that on Facebook Charlie.
jbozzelle- Posts : 3705
Join date : 2009-08-10
Age : 50
Location : New Orleans
Re: Jon Kaase SR71 Cylinder Heads
Charlie,
I did too , just hoping jon will get them in time to make a pull or two with them on the engine.
I did too , just hoping jon will get them in time to make a pull or two with them on the engine.
IDT-572- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 4628
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 63
Location : Shelbyville Tn.
Page 6 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 10, 11, 12
Similar topics
» Kaase K1 cam vs. K2 cam in 521 with SR71 heads?
» Sr71 heads!
» The new SR71 heads
» Kaase SR-71 Cylinder Heads
» Jon Kaase SR71 Build and Dyno results that he also tested with a Tunnel Ram
» Sr71 heads!
» The new SR71 heads
» Kaase SR-71 Cylinder Heads
» Jon Kaase SR71 Build and Dyno results that he also tested with a Tunnel Ram
Page 6 of 12
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum