Blue Thunder vs Performer RPM
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Blue Thunder vs Performer RPM
Anybody on here have any thoughts on how the B/Thunder single 4V(4150) "Cobra Jet" size port intake would fare against the Performer RPM as far as TRQ/HP? The combo in question is a .060 over 460, 10.25 C/Ratio, DOVE heads mildly ported, older Crane flat tappet "solid" profile cam(238-248 @.050) The engine will end up in a 4100lb F100 street driven the majority of the time. We have the B/T intake already. It has had the plenum "cleaned up" & port matched around two inches into the runners. The carb we will be using is a 4781 list number Holley. Thanks, Steve
Price5113- Posts : 17
Join date : 2010-01-03
Re: Blue Thunder vs Performer RPM
Price5113 wrote:Anybody on here have any thoughts on how the B/Thunder single 4V(4150) "Cobra Jet" size port intake would fare against the Performer RPM as far as TRQ/HP? The combo in question is a .060 over 460, 10.25 C/Ratio, DOVE heads mildly ported, older Crane flat tappet "solid" profile cam(238-248 @.050) The engine will end up in a 4100lb F100 street driven the majority of the time. We have the B/T intake already. It has had the plenum "cleaned up" & port matched around two inches into the runners. The carb we will be using is a 4781 list number Holley. Thanks, Steve
I have run both of them on a dyno and the Blue Thunder makes a bit more upper RPM horsepower and the Performer RPM gives a bit more mid range torque. That is at Wide Open Throttle.
I have no experience with driving either at part throttles for evaluating transients.
That BT already had a Dominator flange and the RPM had the bolt pattern changed and was re-machined for a Dominator carb.
Last edited by rmcomprandy on April 9th 2024, 7:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
The Mad Porter and J.Toney like this post
Blue Thunder vs Performer RPM
Thanks for the response on this. Thats great info to know! Judging from the runner size on the B/T intake I was wondering if it would give better peak H/P numbers. I think we will just have to try it(B/T intake) and see how it works. What was the combo/combo's you ran the B/T intake on? Years back I was told from more than one individual that the B/T intake was more suited to larger cubes/stroker combos.....Steve
Price5113- Posts : 17
Join date : 2010-01-03
Re: Blue Thunder vs Performer RPM
Price5113 wrote:Thanks for the response on this. Thats great info to know! Judging from the runner size on the B/T intake I was wondering if it would give better peak H/P numbers. I think we will just have to try it(B/T intake) and see how it works. What was the combo/combo's you ran the B/T intake on? Years back I was told from more than one individual that the B/T intake was more suited to larger cubes/stroker combos.....Steve
Tested them on a 509 with aluminum SCJ heads and a 8896 Dominator carb way back in 2005 for an Engine Masters contest engine; ended up using neither and used a Victor.
Similar topics
» Going 521 w/Blue Thunder 2x4
» Need help with Blue Thunder
» Can anyone I.D. this 429-460 2 x 4 manifold ?
» Blue Thunder 100 cc's
» Here's a little porn for you guys !!!!
» Need help with Blue Thunder
» Can anyone I.D. this 429-460 2 x 4 manifold ?
» Blue Thunder 100 cc's
» Here's a little porn for you guys !!!!
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum