Whats the fastest N/A 10.300 deck engine anyone has seen.............

Paul Kane wrote:

Solomon_Motorsport wrote:

To Mr. Anonymous: Hopefully the image of this car motivates you to get your Capri done. You know who you are.

Paul

Paul...You got that right !!!

Paul Kane wrote:

richter69 wrote:

Paul Kane wrote:

richter69 wrote:Whats the fastest N/A 10.300 deck engine anyone has seen.............

Mainly after results from door cars in the 3000 plus range, not interested in tube cars or piperacks.

I have a customer with a 1968 steel-bodied Mustang, blown 598.

He managed a 6.70 @ 202 mph. The oil was always coming out milky white, so they took some fuel out of it. Next time at the track (nice day): 6.52 ET.

How's that for a door slammer?

Paul

been even cooler if it were n/a.....as the title states..............

DOH! Missed that,,,

Paul

Paul I think its cooler cause it is blown...... last time I checked it was the win light that counted not what some one wanted under the hood. the way I look at it is everyone starts out like everyone else... with nuthing... first one to the win light wins.... no extra credit for losing regardless of what induction you had. they still pay the dude with the win light on.

that should stir em up good lol

jsracing wrote:

Paul Kane wrote:

richter69 wrote:

Paul Kane wrote:

richter69 wrote:Whats the fastest N/A 10.300 deck engine anyone has seen.............

Mainly after results from door cars in the 3000 plus range, not interested in tube cars or piperacks.

I have a customer with a 1968 steel-bodied Mustang, blown 598.

He managed a 6.70 @ 202 mph. The oil was always coming out milky white, so they took some fuel out of it. Next time at the track (nice day): 6.52 ET.

How's that for a door slammer?

Paul

been even cooler if it were n/a.....as the title states..............

DOH! Missed that,,,

Paul

Paul I think its cooler cause it is blown...... last time I checked it was the win light that counted not what some one wanted under the hood. the way I look at it is everyone starts out like everyone else... with nuthing... first one to the win light wins.... no extra credit for losing regardless of what induction you had. they still pay the dude with the win light on.

All true, Jerry, but not what the topic is asking. That's the point.

so who has the fastest n/a 10.300 deck .......

with or without Edelbrock heads?

Paul Kane wrote:

richter69 wrote:Whats the fastest N/A 10.300 deck engine anyone has seen.............

Mainly after results from door cars in the 3000 plus range, not interested in tube cars or piperacks.

I have a customer with a 1968 steel-bodied Mustang, blown 598.

He managed a 6.70 @ 202 mph. The oil was always coming out milky white, so they took some fuel out of it. Next time at the track (nice day): 6.52 ET.

How's that for a door slammer?

Paul

Paul,
Is that car originally from Severn Md?

I went 8.51 156 mph at 3000lb N/A conventional heads................. Does that count?

Im sure this was a spin off from a heater thread i started to be a dick.........

I know this may not count but I went 7.78 at 168 with a 514 stock motorsport "A" heads in Topeka with a High Altitude set up



Ace

Snake yer shyt dont count damnit.................P

bump for an old deal...........

Gary Blair wrote:

Paul Kane wrote:

richter69 wrote:Whats the fastest N/A 10.300 deck engine anyone has seen.............

Mainly after results from door cars in the 3000 plus range, not interested in tube cars or piperacks.

I have a customer with a 1968 steel-bodied Mustang, blown 598.

He managed a 6.70 @ 202 mph. The oil was always coming out milky white, so they took some fuel out of it. Next time at the track (nice day): 6.52 @ 210 mph ET.

How's that for a door slammer?

Paul

Paul,
Is that car originally from Severn Md?

Don't know; it's in Australia now.



Paul

thats not n/a ....... just sayin ...

bruno wrote:thats not n/a ....... just sayin ...

Whether the 6.50's Mustang is normally aspirated (NA) or not isn't the question Gary Blair was asking, Bruno. He asked about the race car's origin and I am being helpful and constructive by answering his question.

The fact that this thread is asking about normally aspirated engines and the fact that the above car is not NA has already been discussed on page 2 of this thread...and I think you know that.

Paul

my little 1968 mustang has gone an 8:26 @ 167 +hink its a 10.3 block
that supercharged mustang is sweet.

Paul Kane wrote:

bruno wrote:thats not n/a ....... just sayin ...

Whether the 6.50's Mustang is normally aspirated (NA) or not isn't the question Gary Blair was asking, Bruno. He asked about the race car's origin and I am being helpful and constructive by answering his question.

The fact that this thread is asking about normally aspirated engines and the fact that the above car is not NA has already been discussed on page 2 of this thread...and I think you know that.

Paul

...lighten up Paul

Sorry. I was under a truck all day and was still covered in grime from head to toe.

Much better after a shower.

-P

P.S. We just stuck a 460/ZF-5 into a 2006 F550.

Haha! I am not a hippie.

4.64 @ 148...pipe rack ,alky injected 598..never ran a 1/4 mile but it went 6.15 @ 165 in 1000 ft...

Friends car...........632 C-460 heads/single 4 barrel sheet metal intake, 3350lbs 29x10.5 tire 8.46 @164mph at Milans Friday night heads up all motor class.