563" P(DD)51 build underway **GOT SOME NUMBERS**

bruno wrote:WHAT VALVE JOB WAS DONE ON THE 2.3 ? IS there any difference in maintence with going to a titanium valve setup ?

I wont comment on the exact valve angle used, but lets just say its not your std deal. That combined with the tit valve being weaker than a stainless one needs to stay on top of the checking of the valve lash.......but you should anyway.

richter69 wrote:

bruno wrote:WHAT VALVE JOB WAS DONE ON THE 2.3 ? IS there any difference in maintence with going to a titanium valve setup ?

I wont comment on the exact valve angle used, but lets just say its not your std deal. That combined with the tit valve being weaker than a stainless one needs to stay on top of the checking of the valve lash.......but you should anyway.

ok

Nick, get with Charlie and Lem, not every detail that goes into these things is considered "public knowledge".

You will not be sorry making the switch to these heads.

richter69 wrote:Schaeffer's

X2 me too

richter69 wrote:Nick, get with Charlie and Lem, not every detail that goes into these things is considered "public knowledge".

You will not be sorry making the switch to these heads.

x2 again................

The way all the parts came out of this motor on teardown I'll damn sure keep using it, even if i have to pay for it...............

So where is that "CENSORD" flow sheet you mentioned John........

72mav wrote:So where is that "CENSORD" flow sheet you mentioned John........

Here it is...

bb429power wrote:

72mav wrote:So where is that "CENSORD" flow sheet you mentioned John........

Here it is...

I need my decoder glass to read that one.the ones I got out of Cracker Jacks

away wrote:

richter69 wrote:no shaft rockers..............but it will be M5 alky injected, green oil.....you know the rest lol.

What is M5??????and green oil????

Inquiring Minds Want to know:)

Wow, Those are some wild flow numbers.

Thanks for sharing.

Later Mark

Mark Laczo wrote:Wow, Those are some wild flow numbers.

Thanks for sharing.

Later Mark

There is more to the heads than just the flow numbers...........

Yes that is true, but you really gotta be pleased with those midlift flow numbers 500/600/650. Anyone that has A heads that are not ported better watch out LOL.

Later Mark, again thanks for sharing.

I like it all, especially the mid-range numbers.
Thanks.John.

It will be interesting to see what the P-51 develops into in the future. Im waiting......

P51 are great.....they aint A460s.

Lem Evans wrote:P51 are great.....they aint A460s.

Please clairify Lem...

A460's are racin' heads............

richter69 wrote:A460's are racin' heads............

Given the numbers your heads flow, I'd say the P51s are as well........

No shit John...
BTW, was looking at TFS A-460 flow sheet, and yours kicked their ass on the mid-range.

72mav wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:P51 are great.....they aint A460s.

Please clairify Lem...

Simple......A460 makes more power.

Lem Evans wrote:

72mav wrote:

Lem Evans wrote:P51 are great.....they aint A460s.

Please clairify Lem...

Simple......A460 makes more power.

............Will the caped crusader swoop in and bust Lems chops for saying this ......***POW**POOF***BAM*** Willl TheCOUG step in and tell them to just start over...........Will Les make a reappearance and prove you all wrong with a well pump motor?? Is the city of Owensboro even safe now ..........Stay tuned to see if our hErO gets his ego up in a bunch

It's "HeRo"........not"hErO".......... big difference.

richter69 wrote:It's "HeRo"........not"hErO".......... big difference.

Not from where I am setting ..........

/\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ And that face is green ...........not the teeth