806 cubic inches ........

wow an 6.00 arm with an A460 block

http://www.rpmmachine.com/ford-460-806-stroker.shtml

make it pump gas friendly....lol....man that would be a monster

I think that will put the pin just under a 1/2" above the valve reliefs. :/

I'd like to see that done in a 10.32" deck block.................

At least you wouldnt have to worry about the pin being in the ring pack. haha
You would need a custom chamber though

Nevs wrote:I'd like to see that done in a 10.32" deck block.................

Seems that is the case.........seems somebody wants some action on the forum

will that even clear the block? because my 4.5 stroke looks a little tight.

A 7.750 rod on a 6" stroke will put the pin .43 out of the hole

Lem Evans wrote:

Nevs wrote:I'd like to see that done in a 10.32" deck block.................

Seems that is the case.........seems somebody wants some action on the forum

does FRPP still offer the a96 in the 12" deck deal ?

bruno wrote:does FRPP still offer the a96 in the 12" deck deal ?

Not that I'm aware of, I believe C&C bought the rights to the design, but I could be wrong.

Nevs wrote:I'd like to see that done in a 10.32" deck block.................

fastford600 wrote:will that even clear the block? because my 4.5 stroke looks a little tight.

If I'm reading it right, that's what they're claiming.








Doug...

bruno wrote:does FRPP still offer the a96 in the 12" deck deal ?

FRPP only had a part # [A96] on the 10.320" block.

They failed to mention the 2" deck plates, Sleeves and massive amount of clearancing required..... oooop's !!! Some one needs to call them and order a complete assembled short block with those specs and see what happens....

dfree383 wrote:They failed to mention the 2" deck plates, Sleeves and massive amount of clearancing required..... oooop's !!! Some one needs to call them and order a complete assembled short block with those specs and see what happens....

Yep, I did the math with the 10.320 deck, subtact half the stroke(3.00), subtract the rod length(7.75), you get -.430, pretty tough get the pine in that location.

I think Nick want more cubes!!!!

'65 T-BOLT wrote:I think Nick want more cubes!!!!

definetly not ....... i was just browsing the good ole internet and came across this fairy tale and did some more research and just dont understand how a business can advertise such false statements ..... most guys talking about heavy grinding with a 4.75" arm let alone a 6" deal ...thats all just curious

dfree383 wrote:They failed to mention the 2" deck plates, Sleeves and massive amount of clearancing required..... oooop's !!! Some one needs to call them and order a complete assembled short block with those specs and see what happens....

yea i didnt see any 2'' deck plates or sleeves in the pic.... better off getting a bigger block!!

James Hahn wrote:

dfree383 wrote:They failed to mention the 2" deck plates, Sleeves and massive amount of clearancing required..... oooop's !!! Some one needs to call them and order a complete assembled short block with those specs and see what happens....

yea i didnt see any 2'' deck plates or sleeves in the pic.... better off getting a bigger block!!

Is there a way to add 2" deck plates?

I imagine it would take more than just deck plates...

great honing job on those plates

10,000RPM should be no problem with this set up

56Tbird wrote:10,000RPM should be no problem with this set up

At this rate just increase the compression to around 24:1 and we will be able to get it done under 4,000 RPM ........add a turbo and we'll have a diesel 385 series Big Ford LOL

away wrote:

56Tbird wrote:10,000RPM should be no problem with this set up

At this rate just increase the compression to around 24:1 and we will be able to get it done under 4,000 RPM ........add a turbo and we'll have a diesel 385 series Big Ford LOL

hmmm that is an idea

24-1 is too much even for a diesel using a turbo...............but some will argue that but yes you can have too much static compression in one lol.