806 cubic inches ........
+19
Havaneiss Dei
richter69
whatbumper
away
56Tbird
605FOX
138
bb429power
James Hahn
'65 T-BOLT
Outlaw5.0
dfree383
ThndrChkn
fastford600
Lem Evans
Nevs
Curt
1Bad91
bruno
23 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Here's how you stuff a 6-inch arm into an A460 (10.32-deck) block: easy-peasy, if you've got the necessary parts, skills and cash.
LOL -- It's not a problem, anymore, IF you've got the budget for it. There are three solutions that I know of:Lem Evans wrote:Seems that is the case.........seems somebody wants some action on the forumNevs wrote:I'd like to see that done in a 10.32" deck block.................
Solution A is to use the M-6010-A460(T) block. It is outwardly indistinguishable from every other A460 block with which we are all familiar; however, the T stands for Tardis. Unfortunately, the properties of this block are such that it has inspired knock-offs that are universally inferior; some of these may have the word TARDIS cast into the valley.
Solution B is to use the extremely pricey and rare elastic sleeve kit ("ESK"); the kit includes the necessary variable-length studs, with premium washers and nuts. Technophiles will appreciate that this kit eliminates the need for head gaskets, as the preussure inside the cylinder is never below that of the ambient atmosphere long enough for the head and sleeve to be separated. The downside is that the required machining operation is much more expensive than installing traditional O-rings. Also, while the cooling issues reported in the prototype appear to have been solved, there's no guarantee that this solution will prove reliable for you.
Solution C involves dynamic connecting rod ("DCR") technology: the connecting rod's length increases in proportion to the crank angle (up to 180 degrees ATDC) and then decreases to its minimum value at TDC. From the standpoint of reliable power, this is probably the best option for users operating extreme-length strokes, as it can reduce piston travel and speed by more than 50 percent. Peak power output during the operating cycle is greatly increased as the throw and the rod approach right angles to each other; however, some of the energy after this point is dissipated by the extension of the rod, resulting in no overall net gain (and in some instances, possibly a small net loss) of power.
Because the swept volume is reduced, DCR-equipped engines operate best as either supercharged engines, or as very-high-rpm engines, or (in competition) as both. I do not know of any sanctioning bodies that currently allow either the use of the above-described ESK or the DCR technology; however, I don't know of any that prohibit the Tardis block.
Havaneiss Dei- Posts : 2
Join date : 2015-08-23
Re: 806 cubic inches ........
I would like to know more about this tardis block. S Leonard thx
BIGINCH'S- Posts : 31
Join date : 2009-12-07
Re: 806 cubic inches ........
BIGINCH'S wrote:I would like to know more about this tardis block. S Leonard thx
it is missing 2 letters ........ "RE"
I am sorry but this cat is on crack .......
605FOX- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 165
Join date : 2009-08-08
Re: 806 cubic inches ........
Havaneiss Dei wrote:the T stands for Tardis..........Tardis block.
BIGINCH'S wrote:I would like to know more about this tardis block.
Ha , Doctor Who reference, the Tardis was bigger on the inside than outside.
DILLIGASDAVE- Posts : 2262
Join date : 2009-08-08
Location : Texas. pronounced "texASS"
Re: 806 cubic inches ........
No doubt, I almost fell out of my chair laughing so hard, should have said DCR rubber connecting rods.605FOX wrote:BIGINCH'S wrote:I would like to know more about this tardis block. S Leonard thx
it is missing 2 letters ........ "RE"
I am sorry but this cat is on crack .......
supervel45- Posts : 4498
Join date : 2013-09-04
Re: 806 cubic inches ........
Thats got to be a typo. Probably meant 606, which is ~ 4.5x4.75
SLord82- Posts : 145
Join date : 2011-07-02
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» 700 cubic inch
» 611 cubic inches of BB Ford brutality...
» cubic inch vs. "the budget"
» Carb Size for 504 cubic inch?
» CUBIC INCH QUESTION
» 611 cubic inches of BB Ford brutality...
» cubic inch vs. "the budget"
» Carb Size for 504 cubic inch?
» CUBIC INCH QUESTION
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum