cubic inch vs. "the budget"
+29
the Coug
KY JELLY
IDT-572
lghting94
DanH
Moodyblues
Darrin Gorham
David Willingham
res0rli9
John Myrick
racnrick
605FOX
badcoupe
c.evans
rmcomprandy
schmitty
QtrWarrior
cool40
138
bbf-falcon
Curt
richter69
SilvatungDevil
BigDave65
dfree383
Lem Evans
cobra501
Paul Kane
bruno
33 posters
Page 7 of 9
Page 7 of 9 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
IDT-572 wrote:bruno wrote:IDT-572 wrote:Your existing pistons, rods, and deck height, make up what your stroke will be. IF you change one something else will be effected.
cool .....
so which combo will accelerate faster ? n/a
4.50 x 4.560
4.60 x 4.560
4.60 x 4.60
I don't think the extra 13 cubic inch is worth the trouble and cost of putting in the 4.6 crank.
I also think your 4340 RPM crank is as good as any other 4340 crank, other than maybe a Bryant.
As far as accelerating, I don't feel with all else being equal on top of the engine you will see any difference.
You just don't want to get the port velocity to high in the port going to a big cubic inch and small heads.
My 580 inch P-51 deal has port velocity about equal to my 557 TFS Street engine.
Getting the port velocity high, but not too high is the way to a good and powerful engine with a broad torque curve N.A. The port velocity will be high on your Eddy's at 580 + inch and spraying will make them a cork.
With you spraying (Mr Frosty) I think you would be better served to step up to the A heads and a 598 inch, 4.6 x 4.5 And take advantage of the added torque and HP the A heads afford.
Everybody took notice of the hp my P-51's made saying it made A head hp, but nobody notice it was a good 110 ft lb down on torque to Boo Boo's 598 at almost the same RPM. This tells me the A heads raised port aids in cylinder filling even over the P-51's.
You build a good Lem built 598 and stuff a 300 shot through it, I doubt you will make a full throttle pass in two years.
JMHO
Well said........like I told Mr. Sherry "I know how to get more power out of your engine....just bolt a vacuum pump on the front of it...in the mean time install the engine and figure out how to use the power you have...the pump can be bolted on any time w/o geting into the engine."
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
bruno wrote:Lem is there no there no other stroke we can do with these existing rods and pistons ?
Your splitting hairs....... Getting lost in Theory and trying to build a bigger motor when you haven't even used what you have now to its potential.
On the Chinese Crank, Typicaly its the machine and detail work that seperates the good ones from the bad ones..... Not the Forging, Now granted the 4340 chinese metal is less consistant the typlcal Ameican metal, but its still decent and reasonable for the price.
IMO Freshen the bottom end....... Check everything out and if something needs replaced, then upgrade. Have lem update the valvetrain.... and start using the fogger and all the NO2...... When your getting every last ounce out of it and need to go faster them think about another engine.
My whole point is you haven't even used what you have to its potential yet and still have alot of work on the chassis and balance of the drivelie to get everything perfect
dfree383- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 14849
Join date : 2009-07-09
Location : Home Wif Da Wife.....
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
Thanks for the new reading material...as far as Im concerned fabio nailed it when he said fog the shit outa what you got...build you a whole new deal as a complete package in the meantime...that way you will get EXACTLY what you want AND need...
138- Posts : 1593
Join date : 2009-08-19
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
Anyway just how fast do you wanna go...and on what tire?
138- Posts : 1593
Join date : 2009-08-19
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
richter69 wrote:tune up the fogger and go race what you have now Nick..........I venture it'll go a good bit faster than what it has. I'd bet the heads will lift long before you blow the crank out of it.
THIS ^^^^^
If anything beef up the rear suspension, housing, axles, etc... I don't give a crap if the small tire guys do it with 8.8s and 10" slicks all day long. Unless you race a class that mandates the 8.8 and 10" slicks run the strongest and biggest stuff you can afford... My personal feel is that 8.8 needs to go. Minitub it with a 9" and wider slicks, turn the hose up and enjoy till the heads lift...
jbozzelle- Posts : 3705
Join date : 2009-08-10
Age : 50
Location : New Orleans
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
138 wrote:Anyway just how fast do you wanna go...and on what tire?
28 X 10 OR 29 X 10.5 ....... thats what it is set up for and to be the fastest local groupies at this track i need to be running teens consistently off the trailer and be able to run a 5.0x ....... i know what engine package i need to do that with a460 etc...... but with these other things ive got going on it wont happen right now. So reguardless i wanted to freshen up this 562" , new cam , change the stroke and add some compression . my goal would be to run 6x's - 7x's on motor and spray the fogger to run 2x's .... i believe thats a fair goal
so the synopsis here is to leave the existing pistons ( as long as they are ok ) increase the stroke to a 4.5 , steel rods 6.7 , new cam and then throw her on the dyno and see if we can squeeze a cople of more ponies out of her
im i going to need a larger carb ?
_________________
coming soon x275 build .........
thanks to all my sponsors :
www.OakleyMotorsports.com
www.Induction-Solutions.com
www.bfevansraceparts.com
www.ultimateconverter.com
www.keithfulpmotorsports.com
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
If you are truly going to stay on 10.5's the light weight of the Eddies and intake will be of some help, but I doubt that it would overcome the extra power of a A headed combo would bring to the table.
After reading what you posted, I think your goals are obtainable, but the problem running those times won't be a lack of hp problem but a chassis problem.
I don't remember what your best 60 ft's are but they need to be at or below 1.25's.
What does your engine rpm peak at through the 1/4 mile.
After reading what you posted, I think your goals are obtainable, but the problem running those times won't be a lack of hp problem but a chassis problem.
I don't remember what your best 60 ft's are but they need to be at or below 1.25's.
What does your engine rpm peak at through the 1/4 mile.
IDT-572- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 4628
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 63
Location : Shelbyville Tn.
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
dfree383 wrote:bruno wrote:Lem is there no there no other stroke we can do with these existing rods and pistons ?
Your splitting hairs....... Getting lost in Theory and trying to build a bigger motor when you haven't even used what you have now to its potential.
On the Chinese Crank, Typicaly its the machine and detail work that seperates the good ones from the bad ones..... Not the Forging, Now granted the 4340 chinese metal is less consistant the typlcal Ameican metal, but its still decent and reasonable for the price.
IMO Freshen the bottom end....... Check everything out and if something needs replaced, then upgrade. Have lem update the valvetrain.... and start using the fogger and all the NO2...... When your getting every last ounce out of it and need to go faster them think about another engine.
My whole point is you haven't even used what you have to its potential yet and still have alot of work on the chassis and balance of the drivelie to get everything perfect
completly understand Dave
_________________
coming soon x275 build .........
thanks to all my sponsors :
www.OakleyMotorsports.com
www.Induction-Solutions.com
www.bfevansraceparts.com
www.ultimateconverter.com
www.keithfulpmotorsports.com
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
Its gonna take close to 1200 hp to run 5.20's in that car
KY JELLY- Posts : 1530
Join date : 2008-12-03
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
KY JELLY wrote:Its gonna take close to 1200 hp to run 5.20's in that car
lets say the 588" does 875hp na then add 300 in the plate and 300 in the fogger should get me there
_________________
coming soon x275 build .........
thanks to all my sponsors :
www.OakleyMotorsports.com
www.Induction-Solutions.com
www.bfevansraceparts.com
www.ultimateconverter.com
www.keithfulpmotorsports.com
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
IDT-572 wrote:If you are truly going to stay on 10.5's the light weight of the Eddies and intake will be of some help, but I doubt that it would overcome the extra power of a A headed combo would bring to the table.
After reading what you posted, I think your goals are obtainable, but the problem running those times won't be a lack of hp problem but a chassis problem.
I don't remember what your best 60 ft's are but they need to be at or below 1.25's.
What does your engine rpm peak at through the 1/4 mile.
my best 60' was a 1.29
as far as rpm thru the traps , dont know .......
yes sir , i was going to take the car out this weekend but the have that million dollar 5 day bracket race here in montgomery so it will have to wait to next weekend , i believe ive got this suspension sorted out , plus ive got the bars just in case , we will see
_________________
coming soon x275 build .........
thanks to all my sponsors :
www.OakleyMotorsports.com
www.Induction-Solutions.com
www.bfevansraceparts.com
www.ultimateconverter.com
www.keithfulpmotorsports.com
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
richter69 wrote:If it were me, I'd gather a set of A460 heads, 4.5 crank, Oliver rods, cam, Intake, etc, etc and stick it under the bed..................tune up the fogger and go race what you have now Nick..........I venture it'll go a good bit faster than what it has. I'd bet the heads will lift long before you blow the crank out of it.
damn another vehicle with that problem
_________________
coming soon x275 build .........
thanks to all my sponsors :
www.OakleyMotorsports.com
www.Induction-Solutions.com
www.bfevansraceparts.com
www.ultimateconverter.com
www.keithfulpmotorsports.com
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
I.m.o. the "588" with a 'mafia' intake, more comp. ratio, and more cam with exceed 875 hp.bruno wrote:KY JELLY wrote:Its gonna take close to 1200 hp to run 5.20's in that car
lets say the 588" does 875hp na then add 300 in the plate and 300 in the fogger should get me there
If the budget is tight...just check the bearings & springs + add the better manifold & cam and spray away..
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
Lem Evans wrote:I.m.o. the "588" with a 'mafia' intake, more comp. ratio, and more cam with exceed 875 hp.bruno wrote:KY JELLY wrote:Its gonna take close to 1200 hp to run 5.20's in that car
lets say the 588" does 875hp na then add 300 in the plate and 300 in the fogger should get me there
If the budget is tight...just check the bearings & springs + add the better manifold & cam and spray away..
sounds like we are building a 588"
_________________
coming soon x275 build .........
thanks to all my sponsors :
www.OakleyMotorsports.com
www.Induction-Solutions.com
www.bfevansraceparts.com
www.ultimateconverter.com
www.keithfulpmotorsports.com
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
well this "was" a great idea....................
richter69- Posts : 13649
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 53
Location : In the winners circle
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
What do you mean was... What happen. Did nik pawn his rims, install some swampers and decide to go bracket racing?...
138- Posts : 1593
Join date : 2009-08-19
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
Did he sell it?
dfree383- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 14849
Join date : 2009-07-09
Location : Home Wif Da Wife.....
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
He better by fofos camaro and build a profiler 632 with 3 kits... I would.
138- Posts : 1593
Join date : 2009-08-19
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
That would make him a bigger target..........
dfree383- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 14849
Join date : 2009-07-09
Location : Home Wif Da Wife.....
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
Yaep... To both sides. perfect.dfree383 wrote:That would make him a bigger target..........
138- Posts : 1593
Join date : 2009-08-19
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
I heard word that he's looking at a lawn dart.................just say'n
56Tbird- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 5260
Join date : 2008-12-02
Age : 65
Location : Hawesville,Ky.
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
I didnt know grudge racers drove dragsters...but he is pretty far south sooooo...... Who knows.
138- Posts : 1593
Join date : 2009-08-19
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
56Tbird wrote:I heard word that he's looking at a lawn dart.................just say'n
They are the ticket for going really fast on the cheap....... and safe......
dfree383- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 14849
Join date : 2009-07-09
Location : Home Wif Da Wife.....
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
Or is a "lawn dart" some kinda tractor...
138- Posts : 1593
Join date : 2009-08-19
Re: cubic inch vs. "the budget"
138 wrote:Or is a "lawn dart" some kinda tractor...
or a new private jet..... Nick what have you been up to????
dfree383- BBF CONTRIBUTOR
- Posts : 14849
Join date : 2009-07-09
Location : Home Wif Da Wife.....
Page 7 of 9 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Similar topics
» 700 cubic inch
» 806 cubic inches ........
» Cubic inch dilema
» Carb Size for 504 cubic inch?
» Max cubic inches for a stock BBC
» 806 cubic inches ........
» Cubic inch dilema
» Carb Size for 504 cubic inch?
» Max cubic inches for a stock BBC
Page 7 of 9
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum